An individual seeking insolvency relief must prove how he lost his assets; unexplained default is not insolvency

Abu Dhabi Court of Cassation, Civil Appeal No. 31 of 2022, judgment of 5 April 2022

Court
Abu Dhabi Court of Cassationمحكمة النقض - أبوظبي
Case
Abu Dhabi Court of Cassation, Civil Appeal No. 31 of 2022, judgment of 5 April 2022
Arabic citation
الطعن رقم 31 لسنة 2022 مدني، جلسة 5/4/2022
Topics
Bankruptcy & restructuring · Banking & finance
Laws applied
Civil Transactions Law 1985 (repealed)
The judgment
Read it on adjd.gov.ae ↗ (ADJD judgments service (Abu Dhabi Court of Cassation), Id 61883; principles from ADJD Technical Office, 'مجموعة الأحكام والمبادئ القانونية' 2022, p. 212)
Summary written
31 October 2026
Print

The principle

Insolvency means that a debtor's debts equal or exceed his assets (Article 401 of the Civil Transactions Law). A debtor in that position may apply under Articles 3 and 7 of Federal Decree-Law No. 19 of 2019 on Insolvency to settle his obligations, and the court must weigh all his circumstances, his responsibility for the causes of insolvency and the creditors' legitimate interests (Article 403). The burden of proving insolvency lies on the applicant: a person who has taken others' money and claims to have nothing must show an external event, such as fire, a slump in trade, theft or seizure, that caused the loss.

The case and the decision

An individual borrower had taken property finance for four apartments and two cars, plus a personal loan, from a bank. Final judgments ordered him to pay more than AED 17.2 million. He applied to the court for insolvency relief under Federal Decree-Law No. 19 of 2019. The first-instance court rejected the application and the Court of Appeal upheld that decision, finding that he had not explained what happened to the money or the financed apartments and cars, or why the losses occurred and whether he was responsible.

The Court of Cassation, sitting in chambers, declared the appeal inadmissible under Article 183(1) of the Civil Procedure Law. It set out the framework: insolvency, under Article 401 of the Civil Transactions Law, is the state in which debt surrounds the debtor's property by equalling or exceeding it; a debtor in that state may file an unopposed application under Articles 3 and 7 of the Insolvency Law with the documents listed in Article 3, which the court decides within five working days. Before granting relief, the court must take into account, under Article 403 of the Civil Transactions Law and the Insolvency Law, all the debtor's circumstances, his responsibility for the causes, and the creditors' legitimate interests. The applicant bears the burden of proof. Drawing on the Maliki principles underlying the Civil Transactions Law, the Court said that someone who takes other people's money and then claims to have nothing is not believed unless he proves an event beyond his control. The applicant had produced no such evidence, so his claim was unsupported, and his grounds were only an attempt to reopen the trial court's assessment of the facts.

Why it matters

Individual debtors seeking relief under the UAE personal insolvency regime must document where borrowed funds and financed assets went and show that the loss resulted from events outside their control. Large bank debts and judgments alone did not establish insolvency. The case was decided under Federal Decree-Law No. 19 of 2019 and the 1985 Civil Transactions Law.

Laws applied

Articles 3 and 7 of Federal Decree-Law No. 19 of 2019 on Insolvency
Articles 401 and 403 of Federal Law No. 5 of 1985 (Civil Transactions Law) — text of articles 401, 403
Decided under this law; it has been replaced by Civil Transactions Law 2025.
Article 183(1) of Federal Law No. 11 of 1992 (Civil Procedure Law)
Decided under this law; it has been replaced by Civil Procedure Code.

In the court’s words

“فإنه على مُدعي الاعسار - وعلى ما جرى به قضاء هذه المحكمة - إثبات إعساره ، فمن ادعى العدم عليه إثباته”

Short quotation from the judgment as published by the court. The full judgment is on the court’s official service.

Related judgments

A debtor who claims insolvency must prove it; the court must rule on the claim as framed and as characterised on cassation

Abu Dhabi Cassation — Civil 62/2015 · 21 October 2015

Insolvency (الإعسار) exists where a debtor's debts equal or exceed his assets; once established, the court may place him under interdiction under Articles 401 and 402 of …

Courts may not hear claims whose court fees are unpaid; an agent who signs a cheque is personally liable on it

Abu Dhabi Cassation — General Assembly 1/2016 · 28 March 2016

Courts at every level may not hear a claim, appeal or request on which the fees due under Abu Dhabi Law No. 6 of 2013 on court fees (as amended in 2016) have not been pai…

An arbitration clause in a subcontract cannot block a guarantee claim involving the issuing bank, which is not party to it

Abu Dhabi Cassation — Commercial 1033/2022 · 24 January 2023

Under Article 8 of the Arbitration Law a court must declare a claim inadmissible if the defendant invokes an arbitration agreement before pleading on the merits, unless t…

A registered mortgage is enforceable for the unpaid balance; part payment and interest disputes do not stop the sale

Abu Dhabi Cassation — Commercial 377/2023 · 18 May 2023

A notarised instrument, including a duly registered mortgage securing a certain, liquidated and due debt, is an execution title under Article 212 of the Civil Procedure L…

Under the law then in force, an insurer's diya liability for a female victim was half that for a male

Abu Dhabi Cassation — General Assembly 1/2013 · 24 July 2013

Diya (blood money) for death or bodily injury is governed by Islamic law under Article 1 of the Penal Code of 1987 and Law No. 3 of 1996, applying the Maliki school. The …

A mortgagee bank may, but need not, enforce against the mortgaged property before other assets

RAK Cassation — Commercial 3/12 JY · 25 September 2017

A secured creditor may enforce first against the mortgaged real estate, but this is an option, not an obligation: it may pursue the debtor's other assets to recover its d…

Source. Summary written by Polaris from the judgment published by the Abu Dhabi Court of Cassation on adjd.gov.ae (ADJD judgments service (Abu Dhabi Court of Cassation), Id 61883; principles from ADJD Technical Office, 'مجموعة الأحكام والمبادئ القانونية' 2022, p. 212), read on 31 October 2026. Party names are anonymised in the court’s publication.
Published for general information by Polaris Corporate Services FZ-LLC. It is not legal advice. This page is a summary written by Polaris; it is not the judgment and is not an official translation. Read the judgment on the court’s official service before relying on it. A judgment decides the dispute before the court; its weight in a later case depends on the court, the facts and any later change in the law or in the court’s own case law.

Begin a Conversation

Whether you are establishing a new venture, restructuring an existing enterprise, or exploring residency pathways — we are here to advise.

Arrange a Consultation →