The registered licence holder owns a sole establishment unless ownership was transferred by the statutory procedure

Abu Dhabi Court of Cassation, Commercial Appeal No. 947 of 2023, judgment of 2 January 2024

Court
Abu Dhabi Court of Cassationمحكمة النقض - أبوظبي
Case
Abu Dhabi Court of Cassation, Commercial Appeal No. 947 of 2023, judgment of 2 January 2024
Arabic citation
الطعن رقم 947 لسنة 2023 تجاري، جلسة 2/1/2024
Topics
Company law · Commercial law · Licensing
Laws applied
Commercial Transactions Law
Civil Procedure Code
The judgment
Read it on adjd.gov.ae ↗ (ADJD judgments service (Court of Cassation), Id 100258)
Summary written
31 October 2026
Print

The principle

A sole establishment is a commercial business (محل تجاري) belonging to its owner or licence holder, with no separate legal personality; its rights and obligations are his. Ownership passes to another person only by a disposition notarised and entered in the commercial register under Articles 39 to 41 of the Commercial Transactions Law, after which the transferee succeeds to its contracts (Article 42(1)). A disputed private acknowledgment cannot displace the trade licence and establish that the manager is the real owner and the licence holder a mere sponsor. Time to appeal runs from service where the party was absent from every hearing and filed no memorandum.

The case and the decision

The UAE national registered as the owner of a sole establishment sued the man who ran it, asking the court to order transfer of the licence to another 'sponsor' and cancellation of the licence in his own name, alleging that the manager had breached their arrangement. The first-instance court dismissed the claim because the claimant was the registered owner and no legal transfer had taken place. The Court of Appeal reversed and, relying on a private written acknowledgment, declared that the manager owned the tangible and intangible elements of the establishment. The manager, who said he was only an employee and denied the acknowledgment, appealed in cassation.

The Court first held the appeal admissible although it was registered months after the appellate judgment: under Articles 153 and 178 of the Civil Procedure Law, time runs from service of the judgment on a party who did not attend any hearing or file a memorandum, and no service had been shown.

On the merits, a sole establishment is a set of assets allocated by its owner or licence holder to a commercial activity; it is a commercial business governed by the Commercial Transactions Law, has no legal personality separate from its owner and forms part of his estate. Its rights and obligations remain his unless ownership is transferred in the manner the law prescribes, by a disposition under Articles 39, 40 and 41, so that the transferee succeeds to the related contracts under Article 42(1); its elements, tangible and intangible including licences, are listed in Article 37. The licence named the claimant as holder, and the only evidence that he was a mere sponsor was a disputed private acknowledgment. The manager's earlier labour claim against the establishment as an employee, and the establishment's earlier claim against him for embezzlement, confirmed that no transfer had occurred. The Court quashed the judgment and, deciding the appeal itself under Article 186, restored the dismissal of the claim.

Why it matters

Arrangements in which a UAE national holds a licence while someone else runs and finances the business still surface in the courts. The judgment shows the Abu Dhabi courts treating the trade licence and the commercial register as decisive: a side letter claiming that the real owner is someone else will not, on its own, establish ownership of the business. Transfers of a business must follow the notarisation and registration procedure.

Laws applied

Articles 37, 39, 40, 41 and 42(1) of Federal Decree-Law No. 50 of 2022 (Commercial Transactions Law) — text of articles 37, 39, 40, 41, 42
Articles 153, 178 and 186 of the Civil Procedure Law (Federal Decree-Law No. 42 of 2022) — text of articles 153, 178, 186

In the court’s words

“فالمؤسسة ليست لها شخصية اعتبارية مستقلة عن شخص مالكها أو صاحب الترخيص التجاري الخاص بها بل تعتبر عنصرًا من عناصر ذمته المالية”

Short quotation from the judgment as published by the court. The full judgment is on the court’s official service.

Related judgments

A bounced cheque is an execution title only when returned for no or insufficient funds (later overruled federally)

Abu Dhabi Cassation — General Assembly 4/2023 · 30 October 2023

Article 667(1) of the Commercial Transactions Law makes a cheque that the bank has marked as unpaid for lack or insufficiency of funds an execution title that the holder …

A debtor company's trade licences and other intangible business assets can be attached by its creditors

Dubai Cassation — General Assembly 1/2024 · 31 January 2024

All of a debtor's assets secure its debts (Article 391 of the Civil Transactions Law), and a creditor may attach the debtor's movable and immovable property except what t…

A claim filed against a deceased person can be cured by joining the heirs; rescinded partnership refunds net of sums received

Abu Dhabi Cassation — General Assembly 1/2024 · 20 March 2024

A claim or appeal brought against a person who had already died is not void beyond repair: it may be corrected by joining the heirs at the same level of court, by a memor…

A partner in a limited liability company cannot be expelled by court order at the majority's request

Abu Dhabi Cassation — Commercial 375/2024 · 29 April 2024

Commercial companies are governed by the Commercial Companies Law, not the civil-law rules on partnerships, except where that law is silent. Article 677 of the Civil Tran…

Bundled claims arising from separate causes are valued one by one for the AED 500,000 cassation threshold

Abu Dhabi Cassation — General Assembly 5/2023 · 30 October 2023

A judgment of the Court of Appeal can be challenged in cassation only if the claim exceeds AED 500,000 or is of unassessable value (Article 175(1) of the Civil Procedure …

Entities wholly owned by the federal government are outside the Companies Law and litigate only before federal courts

Federal Supreme Court — Commercial 963/2023 · 12 December 2023

Under Article 4(1)(b) of the Commercial Companies Law, companies wholly owned by the federal or a local government or their institutions, bodies or subsidiaries are exclu…

Source. Summary written by Polaris from the judgment published by the Abu Dhabi Court of Cassation on adjd.gov.ae (ADJD judgments service (Court of Cassation), Id 100258), read on 31 October 2026. Party names are anonymised in the court’s publication.
Published for general information by Polaris Corporate Services FZ-LLC. It is not legal advice. This page is a summary written by Polaris; it is not the judgment and is not an official translation. Read the judgment on the court’s official service before relying on it. A judgment decides the dispute before the court; its weight in a later case depends on the court, the facts and any later change in the law or in the court’s own case law.

Begin a Conversation

Whether you are establishing a new venture, restructuring an existing enterprise, or exploring residency pathways — we are here to advise.

Arrange a Consultation →