An LLC partner may sue for his share of profits when the manager or general assembly fails to act

Abu Dhabi Court of Cassation (General Assembly), Request No. 3 of 2025 (Commercial), decision of 19 March 2025

Court
Abu Dhabi Court of Cassationمحكمة النقض - أبوظبي
Case
Abu Dhabi Court of Cassation (General Assembly), Request No. 3 of 2025 (Commercial), decision of 19 March 2025
Arabic citation
الطلب رقم 3 لسنة 2025 هيئة عامة تجاري، جلسة 19/3/2025
Bench
General Assembly of the court General Assembly
Topics
Company law · Commercial law
Laws applied
Commercial Companies Law
The judgment
Read it on adjd.gov.ae ↗ (ADJD Court of Cassation Technical Office, 'Collection of judgments and decisions of the General Assembly over two decades since the establishment of the Abu Dhabi Court of Cassation' (2026), decision no. 30, pp. 200-204 (ADJD publications library, document 0901d61786449d2a))
Summary written
31 October 2026
Print

The principle

The general assembly of a limited liability company normally decides what profit is distributed, and a partner's entitlement only crystallises once the manager has prepared the annual accounts and the assembly has approved them. But the manager may not withhold the accounts beyond the three-month deadline, and the assembly's failure to meet within four months of the year end does not bar a claim. In either case a partner may, after exhausting any procedure the law requires, sue for his share of net profits and ask the court to appoint an expert to quantify it.

The case and the decision

The Third Commercial Chamber asked the General Assembly to resolve two conflicting lines of authority on whether a partner in a limited liability company can go to court for his share of profits when the manager or the general assembly does nothing. One line (appeals 1246 and 1248 of 2021, 1040 and 1095 of 2023, 1150 and 1197 of 2023, 641 of 2024) held such claims inadmissible because only the general assembly may distribute profits. The other (appeals 31 and 32 of 2020, 1001 and 297 of 2022, 57 of 2023, 687 of 2024) allowed them where the manager or the assembly defaulted.

The General Assembly started from Article 8 of the Commercial Companies Law, under which a company is a contract to share in the profit or loss of an economic project, and read Articles 27, 29, 87, 92 and 94 together: the company must prepare annual accounts; absent a contractual ratio, profits follow capital shares; the manager must prepare the balance sheet, profit and loss account, annual report and distribution proposal within three months of the year end; and the assembly must meet within the following four months to approve them and decide the dividend. Although the assembly is, in principle, the competent body and the partner's right becomes final only after that process, the manager may not refuse to prepare the accounts, and the assembly's failure to convene does not prevent a court claim. Where either default is shown, the partner may, after exhausting any procedure the law requires, sue for his share of net profits and seek an expert report, and the claim is admissible because the right to profits is a fundamental right of a partner.

The General Assembly adopted the second line of authority and set aside the contrary principle.

Why it matters

Minority partners in mainland LLCs often face managers who never produce accounts or call meetings, leaving profits locked in the company. This decision, binding on the Abu Dhabi courts, confirms that such a partner can bring a claim for his share of net profits and have it quantified by a court expert, rather than having the claim dismissed because no general assembly resolution exists. It applies Articles 87, 92 and 94 of the current Commercial Companies Law.

Laws applied

Articles 8, 27, 29, 87, 92 and 94 of Federal Decree-Law No. 32 of 2021 (Commercial Companies Law) — text of articles 8, 27, 29, 87, 92, 94
Article 9 of Abu Dhabi Law No. 6 of 2024 on the Abu Dhabi Judicial Department

In the court’s words

“حق الشريك في الحصول على حصته من الأرباح هو من الحقوق الأساسية التي متى ثبت حقه فيها لا يجوز المساس به”

Short quotation from the judgment as published by the court. The full judgment is on the court’s official service.

Related judgments

A partner in a limited liability company cannot be expelled by court order at the majority's request

Abu Dhabi Cassation — Commercial 375/2024 · 29 April 2024

Commercial companies are governed by the Commercial Companies Law, not the civil-law rules on partnerships, except where that law is silent. Article 677 of the Civil Tran…

A sole establishment cannot sue on a contract made by the LLC whose shares its owner bought

Abu Dhabi Cassation — Commercial 725/2024 · 12 August 2024

A sole proprietorship (مؤسسة فردية) has no legal personality separate from its owner. The conversion rules in the Commercial Companies Law apply only between forms of com…

A nominee Emirati partner's stake is sham, and courts must apply the 2021 Companies Law allowing full foreign ownership

Federal Supreme Court — Commercial 1471/2022 · 2 May 2023

Simulation (a sham arrangement) is established where parties conceal their real dealings and legal positions behind an outward contract made as a front to the public, whi…

A dissolved company keeps its legal personality until liquidation ends, and a custodian's appearance cures a standing defect

Federal Supreme Court — Commercial 562/2023 · 11 October 2023

A company dissolved by judgment is treated as continuing, with its legal personality, for the needs of liquidation until liquidation is complete, so that its claims can b…

Entities wholly owned by the federal government are outside the Companies Law and litigate only before federal courts

Federal Supreme Court — Commercial 963/2023 · 12 December 2023

Under Article 4(1)(b) of the Commercial Companies Law, companies wholly owned by the federal or a local government or their institutions, bodies or subsidiaries are exclu…

Any LLC partner may seek the manager's removal for serious cause, but resolutions can be annulled only on three grounds

Dubai Cassation — Commercial 44/2025 · 25 March 2025

Any partner of a limited liability company, whatever the size of its holding, may ask the court to remove the manager if there are serious reasons, such as mismanagement,…

Source. Summary written by Polaris from the judgment published by the Abu Dhabi Court of Cassation on adjd.gov.ae (ADJD Court of Cassation Technical Office, 'Collection of judgments and decisions of the General Assembly over two decades since the establishment of the Abu Dhabi Court of Cassation' (2026), decision no. 30, pp. 200-204 (ADJD publications library, document 0901d61786449d2a)), read on 31 October 2026. Party names are anonymised in the court’s publication.
Published for general information by Polaris Corporate Services FZ-LLC. It is not legal advice. This page is a summary written by Polaris; it is not the judgment and is not an official translation. Read the judgment on the court’s official service before relying on it. A judgment decides the dispute before the court; its weight in a later case depends on the court, the facts and any later change in the law or in the court’s own case law.

Begin a Conversation

Whether you are establishing a new venture, restructuring an existing enterprise, or exploring residency pathways — we are here to advise.

Arrange a Consultation →