An LLC cannot be annulled because its Emirati partner was nominal; it converts into a company of the real partners

Dubai Court of Cassation (General Assembly), Resolution No. 8 of 2025, 14 July 2025

Court
Dubai Court of Cassationمحكمة التمييز - دبي
Case
Dubai Court of Cassation (General Assembly), Resolution No. 8 of 2025, 14 July 2025
Arabic citation
قرار الهيئة العامة لمحكمة التمييز رقم 8 لسنة 2025، جلسة 14/7/2025
Bench
General Assembly of the court General Assembly
Topics
Company law · Foreign investment · Commercial law
Laws applied
Commercial Companies Law
LLC Regulations
The judgment
Read it on dc.gov.ae ↗ (Dubai Courts, judgment publication service (نشر الأحكام), Court of Cassation, General Assembly Resolution No. 8 of 2025)
Summary written
1 November 2026
Print

The principle

Some Dubai judgments had held that proof that the real partners differed from those in the memorandum of association meant an LLC lacked its essential elements and was absolutely void, leading to dissolution and liquidation. The General Assembly held instead that, since Federal Decree-Law No. 32 of 2021 dropped the requirement for UAE nationals to hold at least 51 per cent and allowed one-person LLCs (Article 71), an LLC contract may not be annulled because a UAE national partner was nominal (صوري), even if made before that law. A finding of sham partnership instead converts the company into an LLC, or a one-person LLC, owned by the real partners, with shares as the facts show, provided the elements of that company are met.

The case and the decision

At the request of the President of the Court of Cassation, the General Assembly considered how the permission to form one-person LLCs affects LLCs formed by two or more partners before that permission, where the court finds that the participation of one or more Emirati partners was sham.

One line of judgments held that if the partners prove facts contrary to the memorandum of association, the LLC lacks its essential elements and is absolutely void as a matter of public policy, which the court raises of its own motion; nullity attaches from the outset and a judgment merely declares it, with dissolution and liquidation following. Another line held that Federal Decree-Law No. 32 of 2021 on Commercial Companies removed the requirement that nationals hold at least 51 per cent of an LLC's capital, defining the LLC in Article 71 as having between two and fifty partners and allowing a single natural or legal person to form and own one; that Article 359 applies the new law to existing companies formed under Federal Law No. 8 of 1984, requiring them to regularise within a year; and that, the new law applying immediately, such contracts may not be annulled for sham or for lack of a 51 per cent national holding, even if made before it, unless a final judgment of nullity was given before it took effect.

The Assembly explained that regularisation gives legal status to situations that were originally irregular, correcting the course and avoiding the harm of past violations. The one-person LLC, regulated also by Article 3 of Cabinet Resolution No. 77 of 2022, is a new form meant to support entrepreneurs, attract foreign investment and improve ease of doing business, and must be applied in a way that preserves the stability of existing companies. The one-year period in Article 359 did not stand in the way, because a company could not apply to regularise until a judgment had found the partnership sham.

The Assembly adopted the second line: no annulment for sham or lack of national participation, even for pre-2021 contracts, and a finding of sham partnership converts the company into an LLC or one-person LLC of the remaining real partners, with shares as the facts show, if its elements are met.

Why it matters

Many Dubai mainland companies were set up with nominal Emirati partners under the former 51 per cent rule. Disputes between foreign owners and nominal local partners no longer put the company itself at risk of annulment and liquidation; the court instead recognises the real ownership. This removes a strong source of leverage in disputes over nominee arrangements and protects the continuity of operating businesses.

Laws applied

Articles 71 and 359 of Federal Decree-Law No. 32 of 2021 on Commercial Companies — text of articles 71, 359
Article 3 of Cabinet Resolution No. 77 of 2022 on Limited Liability Companies — text of article 3
Federal Law No. 8 of 1984 on Commercial Companies (law under which the companies concerned were formed)
Decided under this law; it has been replaced by Commercial Companies Law.

In the court’s words

“لا يجوز الحكم ببطلان عقود الشركات ذات المسؤولية المحدودة بسبب صوريتها وعدم مساهمة شريك أو أكثر من المواطنين بحصة لا تقل عن 51% من رأس مالها”

Short quotation from the judgment as published by the court. The full judgment is on the court’s official service.

Related judgments

A claim that the Emirati partner was nominal fails where the memorandum and audited accounts show its capital was paid

Dubai Cassation — Commercial 190/2025 · 7 May 2025

Sham (صورية) means that the parties agreed on an apparent transaction that is not real and conceals their true relationship; the sham act has no existence in their intent…

A nominee Emirati partner's stake is sham, and courts must apply the 2021 Companies Law allowing full foreign ownership

Federal Supreme Court — Commercial 1471/2022 · 2 May 2023

Simulation (a sham arrangement) is established where parties conceal their real dealings and legal positions behind an outward contract made as a front to the public, whi…

A claim that an Emirati partner's 51 per cent holding was nominal cannot be sent to arbitration

Dubai Cassation — Commercial 342/2024 · 30 September 2024

Arbitration may not be agreed on matters that cannot be the subject of compromise (Article 4(2) of the Federal Arbitration Law). A claim that a UAE national's 51 per cent…

Any LLC partner may seek the manager's removal for serious cause, but resolutions can be annulled only on three grounds

Dubai Cassation — Commercial 44/2025 · 25 March 2025

Any partner of a limited liability company, whatever the size of its holding, may ask the court to remove the manager if there are serious reasons, such as mismanagement,…

Between LLC partners, a sham shareholding must be proved in writing, and profits are due only once distributed

Dubai Cassation — Commercial 151/2025 · 14 July 2025

Between partners, none may prove anything contradicting or going beyond the memorandum of association except in writing, so a partner cannot prove without written evidenc…

A dissolved company keeps its legal personality until liquidation ends, and a custodian's appearance cures a standing defect

Federal Supreme Court — Commercial 562/2023 · 11 October 2023

A company dissolved by judgment is treated as continuing, with its legal personality, for the needs of liquidation until liquidation is complete, so that its claims can b…

Source. Summary written by Polaris from the judgment published by the Dubai Court of Cassation on dc.gov.ae (Dubai Courts, judgment publication service (نشر الأحكام), Court of Cassation, General Assembly Resolution No. 8 of 2025), read on 1 November 2026. Party names are anonymised in the court’s publication.
Published for general information by Polaris Corporate Services FZ-LLC. It is not legal advice. This page is a summary written by Polaris; it is not the judgment and is not an official translation. Read the judgment on the court’s official service before relying on it. A judgment decides the dispute before the court; its weight in a later case depends on the court, the facts and any later change in the law or in the court’s own case law.

Begin a Conversation

Whether you are establishing a new venture, restructuring an existing enterprise, or exploring residency pathways — we are here to advise.

Arrange a Consultation →