A finance company's loan is commercial, so agreed delay interest and late fees are recoverable

Ras Al Khaimah Court of Cassation, Commercial Appeal No. 18 of 16 JY, judgment of 19 September 2021

Court
Ras Al Khaimah Court of Cassationمحكمة تمييز رأس الخيمة
Case
Ras Al Khaimah Court of Cassation, Commercial Appeal No. 18 of 16 JY, judgment of 19 September 2021
Arabic citation
الطعن رقم 18 لسنة 16 ق تجاري، جلسة 19/9/2021
Topics
Banking & finance · Commercial law
The judgment
Read it on courts.rak.ae ↗ (Ras Al Khaimah Courts, مجموعة الأحكام والمبادئ القانونية الصادرة في المواد المدنية والتجارية والعمالية من محكمة تمييز رأس الخيمة, judicial year 16 (2021), PDF pp. 296–306)
Summary written
31 October 2026
Print

The principle

The business of finance companies is commercial, so a loan they make is a commercial act even if it is civil for the borrower. Delay interest on the resulting debt is due at the agreed rate, subject to the statutory ceiling. Commercial loans by banks, financial institutions and finance companies are governed by commercial rules and usage, so contractual interest on the principal and late-payment charges may be agreed. Delay interest runs from the due date unless the law, the agreement or commercial custom fixes another date; a court cannot refuse agreed delay interest without a legal basis.

The case and the decision

A finance company applied to the Ras Al Khaimah court for a payment order against two debtors jointly for AED 969,586.60 due under a loan, with interest. The dispute reached the Court of Appeal, which did not award the contractual delay interest the company claimed. The company appealed in cassation. The Court of Cassation held that a bank loan is a contract by which the lender transfers money to the borrower, to be repaid with the agreed interest. Under Articles 4, 10 and 12 of the Commercial Transactions Law the activities of finance companies are commercial, so a loan they make is commercial even if it is civil for the other party, and delay interest on the debt is due at the agreed rate, provided it does not exceed the legal ceiling (Articles 76 and 77). Commercial transactions, including loans by banks, financial institutions and finance companies, are subject to commercial rules and usage, which allow contractual interest on the principal and late-payment charges, given the lenders' own funding costs, the risks of long-term lending and the loss of other uses for the money. Delay interest compensates for late payment and runs from the date the debt falls due unless the law, the agreement or commercial custom provides otherwise. By refusing the agreed delay interest without a sound legal basis, and by failing to address the company's material defence, the Court of Appeal erred. The judgment was quashed in that respect and the Court decided the appeal itself. Relying on the expert accounts, it found a principal of AED 962,368.80, contractual interest at 10.97% a year from the loan date of 30 October 2014 of AED 231,013.80, late charges of AED 479,701.80, other fees of AED 1,500 and payments of AED 791,141.26, leaving AED 883,443.14 due at 1 December 2020, and it upheld the first-instance judgment on that basis.

Why it matters

Decided under the 1993 Commercial Transactions Law, the ruling extends to finance companies the treatment the courts give banks: their loans are commercial, and agreed interest and late charges are enforceable. Borrowers from non-bank lenders should not expect a court to cut the contract back to statutory interest.

Laws applied

Articles 4, 10, 12, 76, 77 of Federal Law No. 18 of 1993 (Commercial Transactions Law)
Decided under this law; it has been replaced by Commercial Transactions Law.

In the court’s words

“عد أعمال شركات التمويل أعمالاً تجارية. لازمه. عد عقد القرض عملا تجارياً ولو كان مدنياً لأحد طرفيه. المواد 4، 10 ٠، 12”

Short quotation from the judgment as published by the court. The full judgment is on the court’s official service.

Related judgments

A mortgagee bank may, but need not, enforce against the mortgaged property before other assets

RAK Cassation — Commercial 3/12 JY · 25 September 2017

A secured creditor may enforce first against the mortgaged real estate, but this is an option, not an obligation: it may pursue the debtor's other assets to recover its d…

A loan account is a simple account, not a current account, and must be assessed on the loan terms

RAK Cassation — Commercial 39/13 JY · 24 December 2018

The bank-customer relationship is governed by freedom of contract. A current account is an agreement to settle mutual claims through entries that offset each other, so on…

A cheque is presumed to be a means of payment; the drawer must prove a different cause or duress

RAK Cassation — Commercial 51/13 JY · 13 January 2019

A cheque is a payment instrument, and whoever claims otherwise must prove the reason it was issued, that its cause was unlawful or had lapsed, or that the payee failed to…

Bank loans carry the agreed interest until full payment, including compound interest within Central Bank rules

RAK Cassation — Commercial 55/13 JY · 24 February 2019

A bank loan is a commercial act for both parties, whatever the borrower's status or purpose. Banking operations are exempt from the statutory ceiling on agreed interest, …

LLC partners who sign a company loan as its representatives are not liable beyond their capital

RAK Cassation — Commercial 4/14 JY · 3 March 2019

A loan term falls due early if the borrower becomes insolvent, can no longer pay, or the security is lost, and generally whenever the creditor risks losing its security (…

A transfer of a debt binds the creditor bank only with its consent; a sole proprietorship has no separate personality

RAK Cassation — Commercial 6/15 JY · 29 March 2020

An assignment of debt moves the debt from the original debtor to another person and takes effect against the creditor only if the creditor consents (Articles 1106, 1109 a…

Source. Summary written by Polaris from the judgment published by the Ras Al Khaimah Court of Cassation on courts.rak.ae (Ras Al Khaimah Courts, مجموعة الأحكام والمبادئ القانونية الصادرة في المواد المدنية والتجارية والعمالية من محكمة تمييز رأس الخيمة, judicial year 16 (2021), PDF pp. 296–306), read on 31 October 2026. Party names are anonymised in the court’s publication.
Published for general information by Polaris Corporate Services FZ-LLC. It is not legal advice. This page is a summary written by Polaris; it is not the judgment and is not an official translation. Read the judgment on the court’s official service before relying on it. A judgment decides the dispute before the court; its weight in a later case depends on the court, the facts and any later change in the law or in the court’s own case law.

Begin a Conversation

Whether you are establishing a new venture, restructuring an existing enterprise, or exploring residency pathways — we are here to advise.

Arrange a Consultation →