A trader's computer-generated statements and invoices can prove a commercial debt between traders

Ras Al Khaimah Court of Cassation, Commercial Appeal No. 46 of 15 JY, judgment of 24 January 2021

Court
Ras Al Khaimah Court of Cassationمحكمة تمييز رأس الخيمة
Case
Ras Al Khaimah Court of Cassation, Commercial Appeal No. 46 of 15 JY, judgment of 24 January 2021
Arabic citation
الطعن رقم 46 لسنة 15 ق تجاري، جلسة 24/1/2021
Topics
Commercial law · Electronic transactions · Company law
Laws applied
Civil Transactions Law 1985 (repealed)
The judgment
Read it on courts.rak.ae ↗ (Ras Al Khaimah Courts, مجموعة الأحكام والمبادئ القانونية الصادرة في المواد المدنية والتجارية والعمالية من محكمة تمييز رأس الخيمة, judicial year 16 (2021), PDF pp. 41–57)
Summary written
31 October 2026
Print

The principle

Regular commercial books are evidence in commercial disputes between traders (Article 15 of the Evidence Law). A trader who runs his business with modern technology may keep electronic records in place of paper books (Article 38 of the Commercial Transactions Law), and these have the same evidential value. A supply undertaking is not a separate contract but an obligation within another contract; it is consensual and needs no writing. LLC share transfers take effect against the company and third parties only on registration.

The case and the decision

The first respondent sued the appellant in the Ras Al Khaimah court for AED 806,122.38 with interest, for goods supplied. The appellant disputed that any contract existed and challenged the evidence. Relying on an expert report based on the first respondent's account statements and invoices generated by the computer system it used to run its business, the courts below held the relationship commercial and ordered the appellant to pay; claims involving other respondents, partners in a limited liability company who had assigned their shares by a notarised contract and notified the Department of Economic Development, were also decided. In cassation the Court held that under Article 15 of the Evidence Law regular books are evidence in commercial disputes between traders, and that a trader who uses modern technology to organise his business may, under Article 38 of the Commercial Transactions Law, keep electronic records instead of traditional books, which then carry the same evidential force; the courts were right to rely on the computer-generated statements and invoices. A contract is formed once offer and acceptance match (Articles 125 and 130 of the Civil Transactions Law). A supply undertaking is not an independent contract but an obligation contained in another contract; it is consensual and does not require writing. Characterising the contract is for the trial court, which had properly found a complete supply contract proved by unchallenged documents. The Court restated that an LLC's memorandum and amendments must be registered, and that a partner's assignment of shares takes effect between the parties and against the company and third parties on entry in the company's register and the commercial register, and it upheld the trial court's findings on the assignment and standing. Grounds framed in vague, general terms were inadmissible. The appeal was dismissed.

Why it matters

Decided under the 1992 Evidence Law and the 1993 Commercial Transactions Law, the ruling gives full evidential weight to ERP and accounting-system output in trade disputes. Suppliers who sell without a signed contract can prove the debt from system invoices and statements, while buyers need concrete evidence to rebut them.

Laws applied

Article 15 of Federal Law No. 10 of 1992 (Evidence Law)
Decided under this law; it has been replaced by Evidence Law.
Article 38 of Federal Law No. 18 of 1993 (Commercial Transactions Law)
Decided under this law; it has been replaced by Commercial Transactions Law.
Articles 125, 130 of Federal Law No. 5 of 1985 (Civil Transactions Law) — text of articles 125, 130
Decided under this law; it has been replaced by Civil Transactions Law 2025.
Federal Law No. 2 of 2015 on Commercial Companies
Decided under this law; it has been replaced by Commercial Companies Law.

In the court’s words

“حجية دفاتر التجار المنتظمة في الدعاوى التجارية ما بين تاجر وتاجر. شرطه. م 15 ق إثبات. التزام التاجر بمسك الدفاتر التجارية. استثناء.”

Short quotation from the judgment as published by the court. The full judgment is on the court’s official service.

Related judgments

A managing partner is accountable as a trustee and is always liable for fraud in managing the business

RAK Cassation — Other 56/4 JY · 14 February 2010

A partner who manages a partnership acts as agent of the company and the other partners and holds the company's funds as a trustee. If paid, he is liable for loss caused …

Agreeing to arbitrate needs special authority, but a company that relies on the contract ratifies the clause

RAK Cassation — Other 17/6 JY · 12 June 2011

Only someone with capacity to dispose of the disputed right may agree to arbitration; a company must act through a person with power to dispose of its assets. A general p…

Partner arrangements that keep UAE nationals at 51% of an LLC do not breach the share-transfer restriction

RAK Cassation — Commercial 48/8 JY · 18 May 2014

The rule in the Companies Law that a transfer of shares must not reduce the UAE national partners' holding below 51% of the capital prohibits only a reduction of the nati…

LLC partners who sign a company loan as its representatives are not liable beyond their capital

RAK Cassation — Commercial 4/14 JY · 3 March 2019

A loan term falls due early if the borrower becomes insolvent, can no longer pay, or the security is lost, and generally whenever the creditor risks losing its security (…

A transfer of a debt binds the creditor bank only with its consent; a sole proprietorship has no separate personality

RAK Cassation — Commercial 6/15 JY · 29 March 2020

An assignment of debt moves the debt from the original debtor to another person and takes effect against the creditor only if the creditor consents (Articles 1106, 1109 a…

Where an offshore company never started business, partners recover their contributions without a liquidation

RAK Cassation — Civil 99/11 JY · 31 August 2016

A criminal judgment binds the civil court only on what it necessarily decided about the act forming the common basis of both actions; an acquittal does not bar a civil cl…

Source. Summary written by Polaris from the judgment published by the Ras Al Khaimah Court of Cassation on courts.rak.ae (Ras Al Khaimah Courts, مجموعة الأحكام والمبادئ القانونية الصادرة في المواد المدنية والتجارية والعمالية من محكمة تمييز رأس الخيمة, judicial year 16 (2021), PDF pp. 41–57), read on 31 October 2026. Party names are anonymised in the court’s publication.
Published for general information by Polaris Corporate Services FZ-LLC. It is not legal advice. This page is a summary written by Polaris; it is not the judgment and is not an official translation. Read the judgment on the court’s official service before relying on it. A judgment decides the dispute before the court; its weight in a later case depends on the court, the facts and any later change in the law or in the court’s own case law.

Begin a Conversation

Whether you are establishing a new venture, restructuring an existing enterprise, or exploring residency pathways — we are here to advise.

Arrange a Consultation →