Abu Dhabi Court of Cassation, Commercial Appeal No. 767 of 2024, judgment of 27 August 2024
To be enforced directly, a cheque must be sufficient in itself as an execution title and the right it embodies must be certain, liquidated, due, not seriously disputed and not conditional. Under Article 667 of the Commercial Transactions Law, read with the December 2023 decision of the Federal and Local Judicial Principles Unification Authority, a cheque returned for no funds, insufficient funds or a closed account qualifies. A frozen or suspended account is different: it is stopped temporarily and resumes when the cause ends, so a cheque returned for that reason is not an execution title.
The holders of a cheque for AED 225,000, given for the use of property under an investment contract, placed the executory formula on it after it was returned unpaid on 23 April 2024 with the bank's note that the account was 'frozen or suspended'. The drawer objected, arguing that there was no execution title and that the cheque was not due because she had been unable to use the property owing to a municipal ban on transactions. The execution court cancelled all execution measures and closed the file, and the Court of Appeal upheld that ruling. The holders appealed in cassation, arguing that a frozen or suspended account, like a closed account, means that the cheque cannot be paid and should be treated as lack of funds, as the Federal and Local Judicial Principles Unification Authority had decided in Request No. 1 of 2023.
The Court of Cassation dismissed the appeal. A cheque used as an execution title must be sufficient on its own, and the right must be certain, liquidated, due, free of serious dispute and not subject to a condition or term. Article 667 of Federal Decree-Law No. 50 of 2022 makes a cheque marked by the drawee as unpaid for lack or insufficiency of funds an execution title, and the Unification Authority's decision of 21 December 2023 treats 'account closed' as equivalent. Closure means ending the account permanently, stopping all operations and liquidating it to fix a final balance. Freezing or suspension means stopping its operation temporarily or for a set period, after which it resumes; a frozen account is not closed. Although freezing also prevents payment of a cheque during that period, the Unification Authority's principle on closed accounts does not extend to frozen or suspended accounts. The cheque was therefore not an execution title.
Direct enforcement of bounced cheques depends on the reason the bank gives for return. After the 2023 unification decision, 'no funds', 'insufficient funds' and 'account closed' qualify; this judgment confirms that 'frozen' or 'suspended' does not, so the holder must sue for the cheque amount in the ordinary way. It also links to the General Assembly's earlier narrower view in Request No. 4 of 2023.
| Article 667 of Federal Decree-Law No. 50 of 2022 (Commercial Transactions Law) — text of article 667 |
| Decision of the Federal and Local Judicial Principles Unification Authority in Request No. 1 of 2023 (21 December 2023) |
“أما تجميد الحساب أو وقفه فيقصد به وقف تشغيله بصورة مؤقتة أو لمدة محددة على أن يستأنف الحساب نشاطه بعد زوال أسباب الوقف”Short quotation from the judgment as published by the court. The full judgment is on the court’s official service.
A bounced cheque is an execution title only when returned for no or insufficient funds (later overruled federally)
Article 667(1) of the Commercial Transactions Law makes a cheque that the bank has marked as unpaid for lack or insufficiency of funds an execution title that the holder …
A cheque returned because the account is closed is an execution title, like one returned for lack of funds
Article 667 of the Commercial Transactions Law makes a cheque on which the drawee bank has recorded that there are no funds or insufficient funds an execution title, whic…
An arbitration clause binds only its parties, and enforcing a cheque in Dubai courts can waive it
A party who relies on an arbitration agreement must raise it before making any request or defence on the merits (Article 8(1) of the Federal Arbitration Law). The right t…
Property investment contracts are commercial and belong to the Commercial Court, not the rental disputes committee
A lease governed by Abu Dhabi Law No. 20 of 2006 presupposes that the tenant uses the premises himself. An investment contract, under which an investor exploits property …
A murabaha financing is a sale at cost plus agreed profit and cannot be treated as an interest-bearing loan
A validly concluded contract has the force of law between the parties, and the judge must interpret it according to its clear wording without departing from the parties' …
The registered licence holder owns a sole establishment unless ownership was transferred by the statutory procedure
A sole establishment is a commercial business (محل تجاري) belonging to its owner or licence holder, with no separate legal personality; its rights and obligations are his…
Whether you are establishing a new venture, restructuring an existing enterprise, or exploring residency pathways — we are here to advise.
Arrange a Consultation →