One address inquiry before service by publication can suffice for every stage of the same litigation

Dubai Court of Cassation (General Assembly), Resolution No. 5 of 2023, 24 October 2023

Court
Dubai Court of Cassationمحكمة التمييز - دبي
Case
Dubai Court of Cassation (General Assembly), Resolution No. 5 of 2023, 24 October 2023
Arabic citation
قرار الهيئة العامة لمحكمة التمييز رقم 5 لسنة 2023، جلسة 24/10/2023
Bench
General Assembly of the court General Assembly
Topics
Courts & arbitration
Laws applied
Civil Procedure Code
The judgment
Read it on dc.gov.ae ↗ (Dubai Courts, judgment publication service (نشر الأحكام), Court of Cassation, General Assembly Resolution No. 5 of 2023)
Summary written
1 November 2026
Print

The principle

Under Article 9(3) of the Civil Procedure Code, where a person cannot be served by the ordinary methods, the case management office or competent judge has an inquiry made with at least one relevant authority, and the person is then served by posting on the court's website or by publication in a widely read Arabic daily (and a foreign-language paper for a foreigner where needed). Service at each stage of litigation is a separate procedure, but whether the inquiry was serious and sufficient is a question of fact for the trial judge. An inquiry made once may therefore be relied on for service at all later stages, unless the circumstances call for a fresh inquiry, a matter within the judge's discretion.

The case and the decision

The President of the Court of Cassation, acting under Article 20(a)(2) of Dubai Law No. 13 of 2016 on the Judicial Authority, asked the General Assembly whether, where a person could not be served and an inquiry about his whereabouts was made at one stage of the litigation, the inquiry must be repeated at each later stage or the earlier result may be relied on.

The Assembly analysed Article 9(3) of the Civil Procedure Code. If service by the methods in Article 9(1) fails, the matter goes to the case management office, the competent judge or the presiding judge, who has an inquiry made with at least one relevant authority, after which the person is served by posting on the court's website or by publication in a widely circulated Arabic daily newspaper, electronic or printed, and in a foreign-language newspaper if needed and the person is a foreigner. This exceptional method responds to situations in which further attempts to find the person's domicile or workplace would be futile, and it requires the party seeking service to have made sufficient inquiries.

The service steps at each stage, including the inquiry, the service of the statement of claim and the service of the judgment, are independent of one another, so a defect in one does not affect the others. But the seriousness and sufficiency of the inquiries a claimant makes before resorting to website posting or publication are questions of fact for the trial court, assessed in the circumstances of each service, once it has considered the efforts made.

The Assembly therefore resolved that the judge supervising the case management office, the competent judge, the presiding judge or the court may, in their discretion, rely on a single inquiry for service throughout the litigation, unless the circumstances require a fresh inquiry at a later stage, so as not to prolong proceedings.

Why it matters

Defendants who cannot be found, including debtors who have left the country or abandoned business premises, can delay litigation if a new address search is required at each stage. The resolution allows a single inquiry to support service by website or publication throughout the case, while leaving room for a defendant to argue that changed circumstances required a new inquiry.

Laws applied

Article 9(3) of Federal Decree-Law No. 42 of 2022 (Civil Procedure Code) — text of article 9
Article 20 of Dubai Law No. 13 of 2016 on the Judicial Authority in the Emirate of Dubai (powers and majority of the General Assembly)

In the court’s words

“صحة الاكتفاء بالتحري -السابق للإعلان- لمرة واحدة طوال أمد التقاضي ما لم تكن ظروف الواقعة تستدعي إجراء تحري لمرة أخري”

Short quotation from the judgment as published by the court. The full judgment is on the court’s official service.

Related judgments

A debtor's only home cannot be sold in execution on the ground that it exceeds his housing needs

Dubai Cassation — General Assembly 3/2022 · 28 April 2022

Under Article 106(2) of the Civil Procedure Regulation (Cabinet Resolution No. 57 of 2018), the house used as a residence by the debtor and the dependants living with him…

A claim fee paid late but before the first hearing makes the claim effective from the date of payment

Dubai Cassation — General Assembly 1/2023 · 13 June 2023

Under Articles 44, 45 and 47 of the Civil Procedure Code a claim is registered and effective from the filing of the statement of claim only if the fee is paid within thre…

A grievance against a payment order must be heard by a judge other than the one who issued it

Dubai Cassation — General Assembly 2/2023 · 13 June 2023

Under Article 147(1) of the Civil Procedure Code, a party may file a grievance against a payment order whose value is within the final jurisdiction of the first-instance …

When a claim or memorandum is filed electronically, only its electronic text is before the court

Dubai Cassation — General Assembly 1/2023 · 13 June 2023

Articles 44(1) and 48(2) of the Civil Procedure Code require statements of claim and defence memoranda to be filed electronically or on paper according to the system in u…

An appeal court that finds the claim was not properly served must still decide the merits itself

Dubai Cassation — General Assembly 9/2023 · 24 October 2023

Under the 2022 Civil Procedure Code a claim is brought when the case management office registers the statement of claim and the fee is paid (Articles 44 and 47); service …

When the addressee's home is closed, a process server may serve by posting directly on the court website

Dubai Cassation — General Assembly 8/2023 · 24 October 2023

Under Article 9(1)(b) of the Civil Procedure Code, if the process server does not find the addressee at his domicile or residence, he serves any spouse, relative, in-law …

Source. Summary written by Polaris from the judgment published by the Dubai Court of Cassation on dc.gov.ae (Dubai Courts, judgment publication service (نشر الأحكام), Court of Cassation, General Assembly Resolution No. 5 of 2023), read on 1 November 2026. Party names are anonymised in the court’s publication.
Published for general information by Polaris Corporate Services FZ-LLC. It is not legal advice. This page is a summary written by Polaris; it is not the judgment and is not an official translation. Read the judgment on the court’s official service before relying on it. A judgment decides the dispute before the court; its weight in a later case depends on the court, the facts and any later change in the law or in the court’s own case law.

Begin a Conversation

Whether you are establishing a new venture, restructuring an existing enterprise, or exploring residency pathways — we are here to advise.

Arrange a Consultation →